<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Palin Abstinence Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.extremelyfunny.info/the-palin-abstinence-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://extremelyfunny.info/the-palin-abstinence-debate/</link>
	<description>Its like CNN, but with more cleavage and less integrity.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://extremelyfunny.info/the-palin-abstinence-debate/#comment-8443</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://extremelyfunny.info/?p=720#comment-8443</guid>
		<description>There is one encouraging result on the abstinence front: At least one study of "abstinence only" sex ed found that the rate of teenage pregnancy among kids exposed to this crap was equal to that of a group that had no school sex education at all.  In other words, Republican-style sex ed is no worse than useless.  This is actually good news, because many of us suspected that stupidly unrealistic sex ed would lead to more teen pregnancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one encouraging result on the abstinence front: At least one study of &#8220;abstinence only&#8221; sex ed found that the rate of teenage pregnancy among kids exposed to this crap was equal to that of a group that had no school sex education at all.  In other words, Republican-style sex ed is no worse than useless.  This is actually good news, because many of us suspected that stupidly unrealistic sex ed would lead to more teen pregnancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

